Com. v. Lont; 1584 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

In re: Cullen Appeal of: Luke’s Hospital; 1587 EDA 2011; Remanded; Comments: Panel Jurisdiction Retained.

Com. v. Barker; 2304 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Lau; 2306 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Shamsid-Deen; 2307 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Ray; 2450 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Tapia; 2543 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Holland; 2833 EDA 2011; Affirmed; Comments: Motion for remand denied. Motion for default judgment and procedural bar judgment denied.

Com. v. Williams; 2838 EDA 2011; Vacated/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Wilson; 3196 EDA 2011; Reversed/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished; Associated: 3303 EDA 2011; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished, 3208 EDA 2011; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Blackman; 3362 EDA 2011; Vacated/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Hughes v. Kramer; 177 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Fraticelli; 316 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Brantley; 376 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Stewart; 393 EDA 2012; Reversed; Comments: Judgment of sentence reinstated. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Stover; 480 EDA 2012; Affirmed/Vacated/Remanded; Comments: Counsel’s Petition to Withdraw Denied. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Craig; 740 EDA 2012; Reversed/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Edney; 1274 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Street v. Property A Management; 1299 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Nguyen; 1337 EDA 2012; Reversed/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Hooks; 1391 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Frazier; 1479 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Chapman; 1513 EDA 2012; Affirmed; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Warner; 247 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Echevarria; 2050 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Tarpeh; 2822 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Schwartzman v. Wolf; 2823 EDA 2011; Vacated/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Sickle; 2969 EDA 2011; Affirmed.

Com. v. Speaks; 3186 EDA 2011; Reversed/Remanded; Comments: Jurisdiction relinquished.

Com. v. Newsuan; 136 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

HSBC Bank USA v. Currie; 1083 EDA 2012; Quashed.

In the interest of: D.T. Appeal of; T.A; 1726 EDA 2012; Affirmed; Associated: 1727 EDA 2012, 1728 EDA 2012.

In the interest of: Y.E.T. Appeal of: D.G.T.; 1730 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Lazor; 1772 EDA 2012; Affirmed.

Com. v. Nagel; 2668 FDA 2012; The Commonwealth’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until March 11, 2013.

Com. v. Crawford; 1564 EDA 2011; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until January 22nd, 2013. No further extensions of time shall be granted.

Com. v. Cook; 1856 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s pro se ‘’stipulation To Correct Record", filed on December 21, 2012, is Denied, in light of the fact that it appears that this appeal involves the dismissal of a serial untimely PCRA petition, and therefore, the only issue to be considered in this appeal is the timeliness of the PCRA petition.

Com. v. Ross; 2734 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 7th, 2013.

Waris v. Spectrum Health Services, Inc.; 1974 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 15th, 2013.

Evernu Technology, LLC v. Rohm and Haas Company; 2214 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 21, 2013.

Com. v. Hernandez; 1471 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s "Petition For Remand," the petition and the certified record are hereby Remanded to the trial court for a period of sixty (60) days. Appellant shall be permitted to file with the trial court and serve upon the trial judge a statement of errors complained of on appeal, pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(b), within twenty-one (21) days of the date that this Order is filed. The trial judge shall prepare a supplemental opinion, pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a), in response to the Rule 1925(b) statement, within thirty (30) days of the date the statement is received. The trial court shall include the Rule 1925(b) statement and supplemental opinion in the certified record.

Com. v. Rosado; 2754 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 22nd, 2013.

Com. v. Brown; 1564 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 7th, 2013.

Com. v. Williams; 824 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 18th, 2013.

Com. v. Hollist; 1414 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 22nd, 2013.

Com. v. Tucker; 1314 EDA 2012; The Commonwealths petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until March 11th, 2013. No further extensions will be granted.

Com. v. Thompson; 2166 EDA 2012; The Commonwealth’s Petition for an Extension of time to file briefs is Granted until March 12, 2013. No further extensions will be granted.

Com. v. Cathell; 2722 EDA 2012; Appellant’s Motion for permission to file a reduced number of copies is Granted. The Appellant is directed to file an original and three (3) copies of the appellate brief. The Appellant is directed to provide a Reproduced Record.

Com. v. Carter; 1862 EDA 2012; The Commonwealth’s Application for an Extension of Time to file a Brief is Granted until March 11, 2013. No further extensions will be granted.

Com. v. Morris; 2662 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s Petition for an Extension of Time to file Briefs is Granted until March 10, 2013.

Com. v. Blakney; 1318 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 8, 2013.

Com. v. Castro; 748 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 18, 2013.

Com. v. Books; 2278 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s pro se "Motion for Transcripts of Evidentiary Hearing," the PCRA court is directed to certify and transmit a supplemental record to this Court consisting of the June 28, 2012 notes of testimony referenced in the Appellant’s motion, and provide the Appellant with a copy of same, within thirty days of the date that this Order is filed.

Com. v. Vinson; 2976 EDA 2012; The Petition to Reinstate, and the court noting that the docketing statement has been received with the petition, the order dated January 2, 2013 is rescinded and the appeal is reinstated. The Prothonotary shall note on the docket of this court the filing of the docketing statement with this petition.

Com. v. Stevens; 321 EDA 2012; The Commonwealth’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until March 11, 2013. No further extensions will be granted.

Com. v. Fuller; 81 EDA 2011; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until February 8, 2013.

Com. v. Butler-Hayes; 1001 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s petition for an extension of time to file briefs is Granted until March 11, 2013.

Olsen v. Septa, et al.; 10 EDA 2013; In light of SEPTA’s status as a party to this action, the appeal taken in this matter may possibly be within the appellate jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court. Accordingly, you are directed to show cause within ten (10) days of the date of this order as to why this appeal should not be transferred to Commonwealth Court. Failure to respond to this directive may result in transfer of this appeal without further notice.

Two Nuts, LP, et al. v. OSG, Inc., et al.; 3330 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the October 24, 2012 order denying the motion of appellants, defendants below, for post-trial relief. The October 3, 2012 judgment (entered on the trial court docket on October 4, 2012) appears to have been the final order from which a notice of appeal should have been filed. Accordingly, appellants are directed to show cause as to the basis of this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Mayes; 3159 EDA 2012; Appeal is dismissed for the failure of the appellant to comply with Pa. R.A.P. 3517. Counsel shall file a certification with this court within 10 days of the date of this order, stating that the client has been notified of the entry of this order. If counsel is court appointed, the trial court is directed to withhold counsel fees pertaining to this appeal.

Com. v. Simmons; 1559 EDA 2012; Counsel having failed to file a Brief for Appellant, Appeal No. 1559 FDA 2012 is Dismissed. If counsel is court-appointed *, the trial court is directed to withhold counsel fees pertaining to this appeal. Counsel for appellant is directed to file with this court, within 10 days, a certification that the client has been notified of this dismissal. Failure to comply may result in referral to the Disciplinary Board.

Parke Bank v. Earle; 3047 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the October 4, 2012 order denying the motion of Bruce and Margaret Earle for stay of execution proceedings. Accordingly, appellants are directed to show cause as to the basis of this court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Whitaker; 3077 EDA 2012; Appeal is hereby quashed as having been taken from a purported order which is not entered upon the appropriate docket in the lower court. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal from the trial court opinion Filed on August 6, 2012. Appellant’s counseled appeal from the January 17, 2012 Order denying PCRA relief is pending in this Court at Docket Number 485 EDA 2012.

Com. v. Jones; 3317 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Gowen; 3326 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

August v. Petetti; 3279 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Williams; 3319 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Clouse; 2619 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s "Petition for Remand of the Record" is denied without prejudice since this Court’s December 10, 2012 Order directed the PCRA court to conduct an on-the-record determination as to whether the Appellant’s request to proceed pro se on appeal is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grazier, 713 A.2d 81 (Pa. 1998).

Com. v. Slowe; 1529 EDA 2011; The Appellant’s pro se "Motion Requesting Further Stay of Proceedings" is deferred for disposition to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal in accordance with this Court’s July 18, 2012 Order.

Com. v. Myers; 3366 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Ritner Associates, LLC v. Larkins; 3516 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the December 12, 2012 order denying the defendant’s motion for stay of proceedings. Accordingly, appellant is directed to show cause as to the basis of this court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Collura; 2286 EDA 2012; The pro se "Appellant’s Motion to Reduce Number of Brief Copies, etc.," and "Motion for Permission [to] file an Appendix" are granted. Upon consideration of the Appellant’s pro se "Motion to Remand to Supplement Record," the trial court is directed to certify and transmit a supplemental record to this Court consisting of the complete document filed on June 29, 2012 that is referenced in the Appellant’s motion within thirty days of the date that this Order is filed.

Simmons v. Simmons; 2896 EDA 2012; I am writing you this missive to inform you that I am requesting to be allowed to withdraw my appeal. I have filed a Motion to Mongomery County of comm. Please and the Honorable judge Patricia E. Coonathan whom presided over this case matter.

Com. v. Jones; 2769 EDA 2012; The within appeal is Dismissed for failure to file a brief.

Com. v. Alvarez; 3263 EDA 2012; The Appellant is directed to show cause, within fourteen days of the date that this Order is filed, why this appeal should not be quashed as untimely filed on November 28, 2012 from the dismissal of the petition for post conviction relief on September 24, 2012.

Com. v. Sanchez; 3040 EDA 2012; The Appellant’s pro se "Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 123" is deferred for disposition to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal.

GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. D’Angiolini, et al.; 3180 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the October 12, 2012 order overruling the defendant’s preliminary objections and directing her to file an answer to the complaint. Accordingly, appellants are directed to show cause as to the basis of this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Cavaliere; 3313 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Kelly v. Kelly; 2223 EDA 2012; The within appeal is Dismissed for failure to file a brief.

Providence Ridge Associates, L.P. v. Cao et al.; 3168 EDA 2012; Appeal from the October 18, 2012 order may be subject to dismissal if this matter is still before the Bankruptcy Court and it has been granted an automatic stay pursuant to section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978 (as amended) 11 U.S.C.362(a). If this matter is still before the Bankruptcy Court, the appellant is directed to file with the Superior Court Prothonotary a suggestion of bankruptcy.

Com. v. Austin; 3280 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013, Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Johnson; 3340 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P., 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Pargaonkar v. Pargaonkar; 3360 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Pongracz, et al. v. Wake-N-Bake, LLC, et al.; 3140 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the October 15, 2012 order denying the defendants’ petition to strike and/or open judgment. Accordingly, appellants are directed to show cause as to the basis of this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Young v. Toyota Financial Service; 2705 EDA 2012; The motion to quash and dismiss this appeal without prejudice to the moving party’s right to again raise the issue presented by the motion before the merits panel.

Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Jamaladdin; 1955 EDA 2012; Appellant, Omar Jamaladdin, have been dismissed see In re: Jamaladdin, No. 12-20665bf (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2012), the stay entered by this Court, see Aurora Loan Services, LLC v. Samaladdin, No. 1955 EDA 2012 (Pa. Super. Dec. 27, 2012), is hereby Vacated. The Prothonotary of this Court is directed to reinstate the briefing schedule in this matter.

National City Bank of Indiana v. Manu; 2815 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the August 10, 2012 order denying the defendant’s motion to strike summary judgment. Accordingly, appellant is directed to show cause as to the basis of this Court’s jurisdiction over this matter. This statement is due within 10 days of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this Court’s directives may result in the quashal/dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Garcia; 2681 EDA 2012; Counsel having failed to file a brief on behalf of Appellant, despite being so ordered, this appeal is Remanded for 30 days for a determination as to whether counsel has abandoned appellant and to take further action as required to protect appellant’s right to appeal. The trial court shall notify this Court, in writing, within the 30-day period, of all findings and actions taken thereon. Jurisdiction is retained.

Com. v. Golphin; 2101 EDA 2012; Counsel having failed to file a Brief for Appellant, appeal No. 2101 EDA 2012 is Dismissed. If counsel is court-appointed *, the trial court is directed to withhold counsel fees pertaining to these appeals. Counsel for appellant is directed to file with this court, within 10 days, a certification that the client has been notified of these dismissals. Failure to comply may result in referral to the Disciplinary Board.

Daly v. Grover; 1521 EDA 2012; Appellant having failed to file a Brief the appeal is Dismissed.

Fullman v. Bureau of Administrative Adjudication; 3092 EDA 2012; Appeal involves the interpretation and application of the Philadelphia Traffic Code; therefore, this appeal is within the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court. Accordingly, the appeal at No. 3092 EDA 2012 is hereby Transferred to Commonwealth Court.

Gordon v. Pansini Law Firm, P.C.; 3422 EDA 2012; Appeal you have taken from the October 31, 2012 order granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and ordering that plaintiff’s conversion and fraud claims be tried before a jury appears to be premature. Accordingly, you are directed to show cause within ten (10) days of the date of this order as to why this appeal should not be dismissed. Failure to respond to this directive may result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

Com. v. Adams; 1402 EDA 2012; The within appeal is Dismissed for failure to file a brief.

Palasch v. Agrupacion Hotelier Doliga, S.A., et al.; 142 EDM 2012; Petitioners, the Fiesta Hotels defendants, have filed this petition for review of the December 7, 2012 order denying their motion to amend the November 1, 2012 order denying their motion for reconsideration of, or to certify for appeal, the March 6, 2012 order overruling their preliminary objections. Petitioners flied their motion to amend the March 6th order on September 11, 2012. Respondent, plaintiff below, has filed an answer to the petition and a motion to quash. Accordingly, the petition for review flied at No. 142 EDM 2012 is hereby Denied. The motion to quash and application for stay are Denied as moot.

Bennett v. Gibbs; 3386 EDA 2012; Appeal has been taken from the November 14, 2012 order awarding appellee custody for Thanksgiving 2012. The order also rescheduled a custody hearing from November 13, 2012 to December 7, 2012. The portion of the November 14th order awarding appellee custody for Thanksgiving appears to be moot. For a case to be actionable or reviewable, an actual claim or controversy must be present at all stages of the judicial process, not merely at the time the complaint is filed.

Com. v. Davis; 3354 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Livingston; 3334 EDA 2012; The appellant has failed to file timely the docketing statement required by Pa. R.A.P. 3517. The appellant is directed to file the docketing statement with the Prothonotary of this court by January 25, 2013. Failure to file the docketing statement by that date will lead to an order dismissing the appeal.

Com. v. Reeves; 155 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-1103451-2004.

Amin v. Pocono Medical Center; 154 EDA 2013; from order of; Monroe Cty; No. 3432Civil2011; J. Bubba.

Com. v. Carter; 153 EDA 2013; from order of; Northampton Cty; No. CP-48-CR-000795-2008; T. Himebaugh.

Com. v. Hollings; 152 EDA 2013; from order of; Lehigh Cty; No. 0223-SA-2012.

Com. v. Thompson; 151 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0004275-2011; W. Hamilton.

Com. v. Postley; 150 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0001021-2012; K. Baker.

Com. v. Stocks; 149 EDA 2013; from order of; Montgomery Cty; No. CP-46-CR-0000176-2011; T. Wile.

McCullion v. Smith; 148 EDA 2013; from order of; Carbon Cty; No. 09-0670; A. Roberti.

Com. v. Fratherstone; 147 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0006626-2012; H. Burns.

Com. v. Cole; 146 EDA 2013; from order of; Chester Cty; No. CP-15-CR-0003064-2003.

Hall v. Courtney; 145 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3098.

Com. v. Griest; 144 EDA 2013; from order of; Chester Cty; No. CP-15-CR-0003281-1990.

Com. v. McCray; 143 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0001332-2011; K. Baker.

Estate of Henry J. Loher; 142 EDA 2013; from order of; Chester Cty; No. 1593-1342; W. Flamm.

Com. v. Forbes; 140 EDA 2013; from order of; Montgomery Cty; No. CP-46-CR-0007097-2010; W. McElroy.

Com. v. Webb; 139 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-000293-2007.

Com. v. Jamison; 138 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0305821-2006.

Paupack Township v. Simmons; 137 EDA 2013; from order of; Wayne Cty; No. 628-2012; T. Farley.

Bochetto v. Miller; 136 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 04911.

Ritner Associates LLC v. Larkins; 135 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 003043.

Heffran v. Wenerowicz; 134 EDA 2013; from order of; Pike Cty; No. 27-1991; C. Heffran.

Heffran v. Wenerowicz; 133 EDA 2013; from order of; Pike Cty; No. 278-284-1991; C. Heffran.

Com. v. Cuevas; 132 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0010922-2011.

The Bancorp Bank v. Fanelli; 131 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3880; A. Fellheimer.

The Bancorp Bank v. Clementi; 130 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3858; A. Fellheimer.

The Bancorp Bank v. Day; 129 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3916; A. Fellheimer.

Wojcik v. Kowalski; 128 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 100700225; P. Young.

The Bancorp Bank v. Garramone; 127 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3914; A. Fellheimer.

The Bancorp Bank v. Mancini; 126 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3906; A. Fellheimer.

The Bankcorp Bank v. Mancini; 125 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 3887; A. Fellheimer.

In Re: C.J.P.; 124 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-AP-0000632-2011; A. Mixon.

Com. v. Westbrook; 123 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. CP-51-CR-0800781-2004.

Yampolsky, Mandeloff, Silver, Ryan & Co. v. Economou; 122 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 001809.

Pidc SB, LP v. Kelly; 121 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 2953; W. Zimolong.

Com. v. Lee; 120 EDA 2013; from order of; Lehigh Cty; No. CR-1936-2011; C. Marciano.

Com. v. Moore; 119 EDA 2013; from order of; Chester Cty; No. SA-428-2012; A. Sager.

Com. v. Davis; 117 EDA 2013; from order of; Chester Cty; No. CP-15-CR-0004014-2011; E. Kelly.

Rogers v. Swiatecki; 116 EDA 2013; from order of; Delaware Cty; No. 10-003986.

Clavner v. Clavner; 115 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 10-11591; E. Carroll.

Com. v. Curley; 114 EDA 2013; from order of; Wayne Cty; No. 493-2001.

Grahl v. Chandra; 113 EDA 2013; from order of; Phila Cty; No. 4375.

Lehigh Valley Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Mitich; 112 EDA 2013; from order of; Lehigh; No. 2010-C-4275; A. Epstein.

Bentley v. McAllister; 111 EDA 2013; from order of; Delaware Cty; No. 12-52293; J. Famiglio.