German American Capital Corp, Petitioner v. Com.; 457 F.R. 2010; The Chief Clerk shall mark the docket in this matter as Closed.

Kerecman, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; 1813 C.D. 2011; Petitioner’s request for extension of time to file briefs, and it appearing that said request is not opposed, said request is granted and petitioner’s brief (15 copies) shall be filed on or before January 26, 2012.

Lare, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; 1671 C.D. 2011; Respondent’s request for extension of time to file briefs, and it appearing that said request is not opposed, said request is granted and respondent’s brief (15 copies) shall be filed on or before February 2, 2012.

Kimberly Clark Corporation, Petitioner v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board; 2056 C.D. 2011; Petitioner’s request for extension of time to file briefs, and it appearing that said request is not opposed, said request is granted and petitioner’s brief (15 copies) shall be filed on or before January 26, 2012.

ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Petitioner v. Com.; 265 F.R. 2010; All counsel attending this conference shall have the full and complete authorization of their respective clients to settle these matters. Counsel shall instruct their clients to be available, at the time of the conference, so that counsel may, by telephone, confirm with their respective clients counsel’s settlement authorization, should this become necessary. The parties shall complete all trial depositions or stipulations of fact not later than 120 days after the status/settlement conference.

Cercone, Petitioner v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board; 1811 C.D. 2011; Respondent’s motion to strike reproduced record and stay briefing schedule and respondent’s motion to strike petitioner’s brief, the motion to strike reproduced record and stay briefing schedule is granted in part. The briefing schedule in this matter is stayed pending disposition of respondent’s motion to strike reproduced record and respondent’s motion to strike petitioner’s brief.

Com. et al., Petitioner v. Lucas; 619 M.D. 2011; Respondent’s answer to the petition shall be filed and served on or before January 27, 2012. Petitioner shall promptly serve respondent with a copy of this Order and shall thereafter promptly file of record a proof of service

Raftery, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; 2083 C.D. 2011; Petitioner filed a timely pro se communication with this Court on September 15, 2011. It further appears that the Chief Clerk issued a directive on September 27, 2011, instructing petitioner to file a petition for review within 30 days of that date (October 27, 2011). Because petitioner’s petition for review was not filed until November 2, 2011, it must be quashed as untimely.

Rodriguez, Petitioner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review; 2016 C.D. 2011; Petitioner filed his pro se communication with this Court on September 27, 2011. Because petitioner’s pro se communication was not filed within thirty days of the Board’s August 8, 2011 order as required by Pa. R.A.P. 1512(a)(1), this case is dismissed as untimely filed.