Commonwealth Court

ORDERS & DECREES

January 09, 2013

By Pellegrini, J.

Susquehanna Bank PA, Petitioner v. Com.; 148 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

CNB Bank, Petitioner v. Com.; 147 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 146 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 145 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 144 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 143 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 142 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 141 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 140 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

The Pampered Chef, Ltd., Petitioner v. Com.; 139 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Karlton, Petitioner v. Com.; 138 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., Petitioner v. Com.; 137 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., Petitioner v. Com.; 136 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., Petitioner v. Com.; 135 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Circuit City Stores, Inc., Petitioner v. Com.; 134 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).

Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., Petitioner v. Com.; 133 F.R. 2012; The party’s best estimate of the amount at issue; Whether meetings/settlement discussions have taken place between counsel and whether, at this stage of the proceedings, counsel believes this action will settle or be litigated; Whether there are any related cases pending before this Court, the Board of Finance and Revenue, the Board of Appeals or any other administrative agency (identify by agency, caption and docket number(s)); and Whether there are any cases currently pending in this Court or any other state or federal court that may affect the outcome of this action (identify by caption and docket number(s)).